Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Dunkley v. Warden et al
as 2:2020cv00219
Respondent:
Secretary, Attorney General, Warden and others
Petitioner:
Olwayne Dunkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAKER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00354
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JAMES DEMETRIUS SMITH, SARAH BARBER and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Head et al
as 1:2020cv03690
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Freddie Davis, James Demetrius Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrall v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morrall
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Jones, Kevin Sprayberry and Field Director of Hays Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. United States Of America
as 2:2020cv00074
Petitioner:
Maurice Fields
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fagan v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00349
Petitioner:
Neil Sean Fagan
Respondent:
Fiel Office Director, Atlanta District Field Office, Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Warden, Stewart Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixit v. Fairnot et al
as 1:2019cv05388
Defendant:
Tanya Singh Dixit, Bhupendra Singh, P. Jeya Pazman and others
Plaintiff:
Akash Dixit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Palmer et al
as 1:2019cv03655
Defendant:
Supervison of DCS, Four Field Probation Officers, Frank Nattiel and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. BERRY
as 1:2019cv00109
Respondent:
Berry and Warden Berry
Petitioner:
TOM FREDRICK FIELDS, III
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shreeves v. Gartland
as 5:2019cv00060
Respondent:
Patrick Gartland, William Barr, Department of Homeland Director / ICE and others
Petitioner:
Brian Aldeain Shreeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
