Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Fields v. Fisher
as 3:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fields
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Fields et al
as 3:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Willie Smith
Defendant:
Marshall Fields and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections , South MS. Corr. Institute , Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Fields et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
Willie Smith
Respondent:
Marshall Fields and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections, South MS. Corr. Institute, Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Sollie et al
as 3:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Billie Sollie, Major Robinson, Captain McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Sollie et al
as 3:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Billie Sollie, Unknown Robinson, Unknown McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littleton v. M.T.C. et al
as 5:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Merlin Antonio Littleton
Defendant:
M.T.C., Michael White, Larry Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Attorney of the United States et al
as 5:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jasdev Singh
Defendant:
Attorney of the United States, Secretary Department of Homeland Security and ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curry v. MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
MDOC, Lee County Circuit, Monroe County Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
