Cases 21 - 30 of 506
HENSLEY v. ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR FTD et al
as 1:2020cv05336
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, MR. WILSON, ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR FTD and others
Plaintiff:
GARY LLOYD HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv05125
Defendant:
MS. ANGIE, SERGEANT CHARD, OFFICER GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff:
QUADIR ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2020cv03183
Defendant:
JENNIFER FARESTAD, ANTHONY THOMAS, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACQUES v. FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv01559
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
GARY JACQUES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISOM v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19601
Plaintiff:
MARTESS ISOM and Gary Hodges
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SARGEANT'S ROBERTS, JACK ISABELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. POWELL et al
as 3:2019cv18232
Petitioner:
GARY ABDQ HARRIS
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN POWELL, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SUTTLE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2019cv17041
Petitioner:
GARY SUTTLE, BOBBY B. SUTTLE, BOBBY SUTTLE and others
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IVESTER v. SWEENY et al
as 3:2019cv16559
Defendant:
GREG ORT, JOHN DOE WARDEN, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL INVESTER and MICHAEL IVESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2019cv15320
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, IHOUMA NWACHUKWA, NICOLAUS KUEHN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
