Cases 21 - 30 of 31
RICHARDS v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2010cv01583
Defendant:
MS. JANE DOE, N.P., MS. GONZALES, N.P., DR. HIRSCHLER, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2009cv00541
Plaintiff:
Lovelle Fredrick
Defendant:
Gonzales, Artisdel and Ed Buss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Link v. Rhymer et al
as 1:2007cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ray Link
Defendant:
Toby H Rhymer, John A Gonzales, Rick Tindally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALES et al VS VEACH
as 2:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. GONZALES and R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
WALKER et al v. SCHOTT et al
as 2:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, DARYL KOSIAK, MICHAEL K NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAFAEL v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2007cv00098
Petitioner:
CHAPOTIN MARFARLAN RAFAEL
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and ALBERTO R. GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzales v. Davis
as 2:2007cv00042
Petitioner:
Argelio Gonzales
Respondent:
Cecil Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Davis
as 2:2007cv00041
Petitioner:
Argelio Gonzales
Respondent:
Cecil Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
