Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Gonzalez v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Quiroz Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Preston Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv02804
Petitioner:
William Gonzalez Diaz
Respondent:
Eric Holder, C. Lopez, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez-Diaz v. Holder et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
William Gonzalez-Diaz
Defendant:
Eric Holder, C. Lopez, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saucedo-Gonzalez v. Holbrook et al
as 1:2010cv02375
Plaintiff:
Luis Saucedo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Holbrook, B Alley, John Rathman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Holbrook et al
as 1:2010cv01024
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Holbrook, B Alley, John Rathman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Huntley
as 7:2009cv02596
Petitioner:
Margarito Gonzalez
Respondent:
Rodney Huntley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv02243
Petitioner:
Ramon Luis Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Juvenal v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2008cv00228
Plaintiff:
Gonzalez Delgado Juvenal
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv08037
Petitioner:
Mateo Jaime Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
