Cases 21 - 30 of 397
Koch v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv01579
Plaintiff:
Amy Michelle Koch
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brian Belleque, Rob Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00629
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Janelle Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. State of Oregon, et al,.
as 2:2021cv00631
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrave v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00633
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Mike Gower, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gaye Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Endicott-Orren v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00564
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Anthony Ross, John/Jane Doe, Assistant Superintendent of Security and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany Endicott-Orren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Thurnau et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Defendant:
Michael Gower, M. Grant, K. Wiley and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Everett Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Jane/John Doe, Anthony Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkerson et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, John Doe 3, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Edwards, Nolan James Dabell, William J. Parkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. ODOC Health Services et al
as 2:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Price, Michael Gower, ODOC Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
