Cases 21 - 30 of 39
KYNER et al v. BUTTS
as 1:2014cv00400
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS and GREG ZOELLER
Petitioner:
ERIC M. KYNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELDER v. SMITH
as 1:2014cv00077
Petitioner:
JOHN B. FELDER
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWELL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv01792
Defendant:
SAM CRAIG, ANDREA MCCORD, JAMES SLONE and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00960
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. ZOELLER
as 2:2013cv00156
Petitioner:
KIEARA R. CARTER
Respondent:
GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00474
Respondent:
ANDY CAPPA, COUNTY OF WAYNE, DARRIN DOLEHANTY and others
Petitioner:
DEDRIC D. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles E. Sweeney, Jr. v. Richard Brown
as 13-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG ZOELLER
PERRY v. ZOELLER
as 1:2012cv00938
Petitioner:
RODNEY J. PERRY
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZENK and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Stork v. Jeff Sanford, et al
as 12-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK E. STORK
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF SANFORD, City Attorney, NICHOLAS MCKINLEY, Police Officer South Bend Police, GREG ZOELLER, Indiana Attorney General and others
Frank Stork v. Jeff Sanford, et al
as 12-2548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK E. STORK
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF SANFORD, City Attorney, NICHOLAS MCKINLEY, Police Officer South Bend Police, GREG ZOELLER, Indiana Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
