Cases 21 - 30 of 247
(PC) Hamilton v. Ables et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
L. Ables, David Clays, Patrick Covello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hamilton v. Allison
as 2:2022cv01901
Petitioner:
Kari Ann Hamilton
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv06219
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Davis, Austen, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo Cruz v. Calderon et al
as 4:2022cv05556
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Calderon, Hamilton, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Hamilton
as 4:2022cv06121
Plaintiff:
Rhonda A. Fleming
Defendant:
Nurse Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert John Hamilton v. Los Angeles County Child Support Department Services et al
as 2:2022cv06592
Plaintiff:
Albert John Hamilton
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Child Support Department Services and Traysena Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Chhabria et al
as 4:2022cv03445
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Hon. Vince Chhabria, Hon. Joseph C. Spero, Hon. Richard Seeborg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
