Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Rayshon Thomas v. Parties Calipatria C D C R et al
as 2:2012cv10220
Defendant:
Carlo Andreani, BBB etc Internia, Attorney General Edmund Brown, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Thomas
Jaime Perea v. Ray Lorea, et al
as 12-56578
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME TAPIA PEREA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY LOREA, Sheriff, IMPERIAL COUNTY, IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Hall et al v. Imperial, County of et al
as 3:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Hall
Defendant:
Imperial, County of, Imperial County Sheriff's Department, Raymond Loera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Nunez v. D. Worthington, et al
as 11-56577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MUNOZ NUNEZ, AKA Victor Nunez Munoz, AKA Victor Nunoz Munoz
Defendant - Appellee:
D. WORTHINGTON, Ms., CLAYTON, IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL, All Staff and others
Nunez v. Worthington et al
as 3:2011cv01862
Plaintiff:
Victor Munoz Nunez
Defendant:
D. Worthington, Clayton, Imperial County Jail all Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Worthington et al
as 4:2011cv03384
Plaintiff:
Victor Munoz Nunez
Defendant:
D. Worthington, Clayton and Imperial County Jail all Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez Munoz v. Worthington et al
as 3:2011cv01524
Plaintiff:
Victor Nunez Munoz
Defendant:
D Worthington, Clayton, Imperial County, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez Munoz v. Imperial County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv00888
Petitioner:
Victor Nunez Munoz
Respondent:
Imperial County Jail , Clayton , Pamphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Imperial County et al
as 3:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
David E Fuller
Defendant:
Imperial County, ., Raymond Loera, J Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01565
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
