Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Kensu v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2012cv11877
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje Warden, Jeffrey C. Stieve, MD, Craig Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Schuh v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL SCHUH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, STEPHEN H. MARSCHKE, Internal Affairs Manager of M.D.O.C. and others
Lewis v. Parker et al
as 4:2011cv14472
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis
Defendant:
B Parker, Soper, Mullins and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Stephen Lovely v. James Armstrong, et al
as 11-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN LOVELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ARMSTRONG, VEDA DOVE, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director and others
Perry Davis v. Dennis Straub, et al
as 11-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERRY ALAN DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS STRAUB, Warden, BLAINE LAFLER, STEVEN RIVARD, Warden and others
Hull #237801 v. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00623
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Hull #237801
Defendant:
Unknown Baker, J. Minnerick, Djuana Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Baldwin v. Kurt Jones, et al
as 11-1485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KURT JONES, Warden, UNKNOWN CHANDLER and JAMES ARMSTRONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
