Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Wright v. Ruze, MD et al
as 1:2020cv10369
Defendant:
Patricia Ruze, MD, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2019cv11349
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Naphcare Medical Department, Jane Doe # 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv10082
Defendant:
Jane Does, Francis D. Pien, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Jospeh Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiSessa v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv11393
Defendant:
Superintendent Kelly Ryan, Carol Higgins-O'Brien, Michael Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. DiSessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spatig v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv11023
Plaintiff:
Max Spatig
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, Fort Devens Federal Medical Center, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartel v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv10990
Plaintiff:
Cory Bartel
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montrond v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
Amaral Montrond
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Turco, III, Michael Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v. Worcester County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2017cv40008
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
Worcester County Sheriffs Dept., Lewis G. Evangelidis and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Higgins O'Brien
as 1:2016cv10058
Plaintiff:
George Johnson
Defendant:
Carol Higgins O'Brien, Jane Doe (Russo), Superintendent (MCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
