Cases 21 - 30 of 32
James v. Tan et al
as 4:2013cv03206
Defendant:
Sue Baum, Trish Brockman, Jane Doe Dianne and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Poland et al
as 4:2013cv03205
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Steve Jenkins, John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Graves et al
as 8:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Barfield
Defendant:
Jane Does, Lesley Douglas, Etta Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuck v. Peart et al
as 4:2012cv03252
Defendant:
Janet Boyer, Carriage House Companies, Salvador Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
William Zuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancoch v. Foxall et al
as 8:2012cv00385
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Foxall and Mental Illness
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hancoch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Graves et al
as 8:2012cv00221
Defendant:
Administrator of County Court Douglas County, Lesley Douglas, Etta Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Houston et al
as 4:2011cv03086
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Daniel Danaher, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Douglas County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Sabatka-Rine et al
as 4:2011cv03036
Defendant:
Douglas Diltz, James Dunn, George Green and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ronald Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nattress v. Casebolt et al
as 4:2008cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ronald Nattress
Defendant:
Casebolt and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
