Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Victor Parsons, et al v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-17282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS, SHAWN JENSEN, STEPHEN SWARTZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections
Delvin Simmons v. Dallas Police Department, et al
as 15-10705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELVIN BERNARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER SCOTT MATTHEW JAY, OFFICER JEREMY SMITH, OFFICER PAULO BETANCOURT, #9212, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Jr., United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
David J Ebbert and Kevin Pigos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv01778
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jeffrey Thomas, Lt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Thomas, Johnson, C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2014cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, A. Edinger, Francis Fasciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00762
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Thomas, Johnson, Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
