Cases 21 - 30 of 1,381
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. USA
as 2:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Jeremy John Gilbert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniels v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv05077
Plaintiff:
Devon Marteen Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Young, John Ringer and Mary Robinette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Tina McCraw, Suzan Coleman, John Hurt and others
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob M Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bones et al v H.I.G. Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bones, T. G. and C. G.
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital, LLC., Wellpath, County of Clallam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Lisa Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Cole et al
as 4:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Robert E Dixon
Defendant:
Amanda Cole, A Hogar, C Kairos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05006
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
