Cases 21 - 30 of 366
Jones v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv03262
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv02854
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Jones
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer Seroski, B. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisneros v. Peacock et al
as 1:2022cv02522
Plaintiff:
Tandy Marie Amaro Cisneros
Defendant:
Denise Peacock, Monica Gomez, Jamie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv02855
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Jones
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer Seroski and B. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv02154
Plaintiff:
Eric Levelle Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Colorado, El Paso County Criminal Justice Center, Wellpath Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Williams, Grielick, Hudgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00818
Petitioner:
Charles Moss
Respondent:
D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calbart v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Ernie Calbart
Defendant:
Jackson, K. Jones, Carrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. US Marshal et al
as 1:2021cv03371
Petitioner:
Georgiana Jones
Respondent:
US Marshal, Denver City Jail, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
