Cases 21 - 30 of 4,507
Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dillingham
Defendant:
K. Mills, D. Williams, J. Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Almaguer Jr. v. Nixon et al
as 2:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Javier Almaguer Jr.
Defendant:
K. Nixon and Odeluga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Almaguer Jr. v. Nixon et al
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Javier Almaguer Jr.
Defendant:
K. Nixon and Odeluga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Coffer v. Quitner et al
as 2:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Christopher Coffer
Defendant:
Zoe Quitner, Williams, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Allan et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Al-Mon Johnson
Defendant:
K. Allan, S. Childress, C Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Jr. v. Felts et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DePonte v. Stohl et al
as 3:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Stohl, Stern, J. Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chalker v. Painter
as 1:2024cv01366
Petitioner:
Justin S. Chalker
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
