Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Silva v. Roden
as 1:2011cv10944
Petitioner:
Randy K. Silva
Respondent:
Gary Roden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis et al v. Terestre et al
as 1:2011cv10711
Plaintiff:
Tanya Lewis, Joel Clay and Jurett Weathers
Defendant:
Albert Terestre, Daniel Adams, Alfredo Andres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Fillis et al
as 4:2011cv40019
Plaintiff:
Celestino Colon
Defendant:
Charles Fillis, Thomas Ficco, Richard Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre v. Moriarty et al
as 4:2011cv40009
Plaintiff:
Donald K Andre, Jr.
Defendant:
Moriarty , Lemire , Guy Glodis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litchfield et al v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2010cv12222
Plaintiff:
John K Litchfield , Helen M Litchfield , Brian Paine and others
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Lt. Busby, Lowell Transitional Living Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sires v. Hefferman et al
as 1:2010cv11993
Plaintiff:
William S. Sires
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth Hefferman, Harold W. Clarke, James Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. USA
as 1:2010cv11526
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scott K. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cryer v. UMass Medical Correctional et al
as 1:2010cv11346
Plaintiff:
Derek Sincere Black Wolf Cryer
Defendant:
UMass Medical Correctional, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donnelly v. Umass Correctional Medical Program et al
as 1:2009cv11995
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Donnelly
Defendant:
Umass Correctional Medical Program, Tom Hicks, Marlene Dodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeBaron v. Hicks et al
as 1:2009cv11904
Plaintiff:
Nathan Marquis LeBaron
Defendant:
Tom Hicks, Marlene Dodge, Aysha Hameed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
