Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Singley v. Nichols et al
as 4:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Ferris Singley and Ferris Geiger Singley
Defendant:
John S. Nichols, S.C. Supreme Court Commission of Lawyer Conduct, Ashliegh R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. Austin
as 2:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Kyra Tranae Kelly
Defendant:
Caleb S. Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Warden Kelly, James Savge, Doc Deezien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson v. Dozier et al
as 9:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
Harrell T Richardson
Defendant:
Vernetia Dozier, Arelia Mathis, Terrance Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
King v. Rouse et al
as 0:2021cv03459
Plaintiff:
Mikel E. King
Defendant:
Chassity Rouse, Randy Fleming, Shelby Guyton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltie v. Anderson, County of et al
as 8:2021cv03876
Plaintiff:
Brian Joseph Stoltie
Defendant:
County of Anderson, County of Greenville, Anderson County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham v. English et al
as 1:2021cv02867
Plaintiff:
Kathy Branham
Defendant:
Ashley English, Lynn Davis, Tamika Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazyck v. Medical Dept Well Path et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Mazyck
Defendant:
Medical Dept Well Path, Hill Finklea Detention Center, Deanna Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 6:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Dennis Kelly, Lonnie Smith, Chris Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruton v. Lee Correction Warden
as 0:2021cv00726
Respondent:
Lee Correction Warden
Petitioner:
Kelly Bruton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
