Cases 21 - 30 of 1,367
Shaffer v. Iteka et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phillip Marshall Shaffer
Defendant:
Rolie Iteka, Kevin Schiwart, Jennifer Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Christopher Uledau, Bryan Rietsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohute v. Braquet
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Kaitlyn Braquet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merryman v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Reginald Chambers and Kevin Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Bryan Rietsma, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04627
Petitioner:
Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shakouri v. Becker et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Defendant:
Scott Becker, John Rolater, Jennifer Edgeworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
