Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Radick v. Potter et al
as 3:2016cv00850
Petitioner: Luke Thomas Radick
Respondent: J. Potter, Federal Detention Center, Philadelphia, Warden, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RADICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06581
Plaintiff: LUKE THOMAS RADICK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IN RE: RADICK
as 2:2015cv01907
Petitioner: LUKE THOMAS RADICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2014cv00219
Petitioner: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLIS v. REGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant: DANIEL D. REGAN, NATHAN HARPER, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLATT v. MORAVIAN COLLEGE AND THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY et al
as 5:2013cv07228
Plaintiff: JAMES ANDREW BLATT
Defendant: MORAVIAN COLLEGE AND THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, CITY OF BETHLEHEM, SEAN TALLARICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2013cv04736
Plaintiff: TYRE SMITH
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURTS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLHOFF v. BENSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01679
Plaintiff: DARREN GLENN MILLHOFF
Defendant: MARK BENSON, ERIC MILLER, LUKE NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPUCK v. STOWITSKY et al
as 3:2008cv00276
Petitioner: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Respondent: PAUL STOWITSKY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CLEARFIELD, PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?