Cases 21 - 30 of 233
(PC) Belyew v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 2:2022cv02115
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Belyew
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Grout and Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Wray et al
as 2:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Lisa Monaco and Donald Specter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heller v. Molina et al
as 3:2022cv07142
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Heller
Defendant:
Carlos Molina, Barbier Security, Dominican College and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald E. Booker v. J. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv07644
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
J. Miller, J. Williams, Lisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022at00759
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Francisco Murillo v. Gardena Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Francisco Murillo
Defendant:
Gardena Police Department, Emergency Sector, Gardena Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Taniguchi et al
as 3:2021cv08889
Plaintiff:
Sirvontre Ingram
Defendant:
Neal Taniguchi, Jonathan Karesh, Donald Ayoob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Felix
as 3:2021cv08876
Plaintiff:
Elijah Dominguez
Defendant:
Maria Lisa Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
