Cases 21 - 30 of 272
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01253
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Ayala-Landor v. USA
as 3:2021cv01300
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Ayala-Landor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(HC) Nava v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2021cv00594
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alarcon Nava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Alberto Torres v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01730
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Torres
Defendant:
United States of America - UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rudzavice et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toledo v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cata v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitchcock v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
