Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 526
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff: Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant: Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Glossip et al
as 4:2023cv04185
Plaintiff: Adrian Bailey
Defendant: Louis Glossip, Brad Abernathy, Courtney Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv03486
Plaintiff: Matthew Nelson
Defendant: Berry W Morgan, Britton Ferrell and Mississippi County Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Burge et al
as 1:2023cv01398
Plaintiff: Keon Lipscomb
Defendant: John Burge, Mindi Nurse and Matthew Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. DeLeo et al
as 3:2023cv03295
Plaintiff: Marc Thornton
Defendant: John DeLeo, Tracey Vasil Biscontini, Valerie Behrle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10210
Plaintiff: Nathan Matthews
Defendant: John Doe and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Bannua et al
as 1:2023cv07179
Plaintiff: Nathan Matthews
Defendant: Cage Bannua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Othman v. Cagababanua et al
as 1:2023cv05455
Plaintiff: Abed Othman
Defendant: Cagababanua, Matthew Cobble, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv05519
Plaintiff: Joseph D. Matthews
Defendant: David Gomez, Darrin Hunter, Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poulin v. USA
as 2:2023cv02173
Petitioner: Matthew R Poulin
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?