Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Boykins v. Taylor et al
as 7:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dontrell Boykins
Defendant:
Officer Taylor and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail and Hampton Roads Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitefield v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitefield and David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sgt. Artis, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfoot v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Lightfoot
Defendant:
Clent D. Davis, M. Maurice and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaBarge v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00476
Petitioner:
Branden Maurice LaBarge
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and William Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Gregory
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Miss. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinkfield v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Meyer et al
as 1:2021cv01428
Plaintiff:
Wayne Alphonso Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Meyer, Ross Maurice, Dichell Wiliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Scott
as 3:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Judge Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
