Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Thomas J. Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Chad Brewbaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Waller, Thomas Hicks, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Adams
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hill County District Court, Texas
as 4:2020cv00030
Petitioner:
Dale Miller
Respondent:
Hill County District Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Miller v. Bovy et al
as 6:2020cv02002
Plaintiff:
Levi Farren Miller
Defendant:
Alex Bovy and Steven Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Fuller et al
as 4:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Khyla Dyer, Zenaya Farley, Tyler Herrick and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deterding v. Newton Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, Scott Miller, Mike Robinson and others
In Re:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Deterding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Salvation Army et al
as 4:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Aaron Rodriguez, Salvation Army, Christopher Chiodo and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Miller, Jr.
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00359
Defendant:
Samuel Huff, IV, Michael Walton, Daniel P. Furlong and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2019cv00236
Petitioner:
Eric C Miller and Eric C. Miller
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Thomas J Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2019cv00146
Respondent:
Thomas Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Chad Brewbaker and Polk County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
