Cases 21 - 30 of 30
MOLINA v. HUNTER et al
as 2:2013cv02497
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant:
WILLIAM HUNTER, RAFAEL CORDERO and JACK CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOLINA v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2012cv05824
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, GEORGE ONDREJKA, FRANCIS FIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv04422
Plaintiff:
DONALD BARRETT
Defendant:
LUIAS GIORLA, C. MOLINA, T. OLANIY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLINA v. LONGLEY
as 1:2010cv00294
Petitioner:
RICARDO MOLINA
Respondent:
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv05022
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MOLINA, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOLINA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2010cv04596
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MOLINA
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOLINA v. LONGLEY
as 1:2010cv00133
Petitioner:
RICARDO MOLINA
Respondent:
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOLINA v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2008cv00343
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MOLINA
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOLINA v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2007cv00192
Petitioner:
YERKO ANTONIO MOLINA
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOLINA
as 2:2007cv01537
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JORGE LUIS MOLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
