Cases 21 - 30 of 348
Morris v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv00871
Petitioner:
LaMarcus Darnell Morris
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferguson v. Donald Wendall Warren et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Darrell Carlin Ferguson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants (3:23-cv-155-S), Donald Wendall Warren, Newton Williams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hadnot v. Pena
as 4:2022cv03522
Plaintiff:
Morris Hadnot
Defendant:
A Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Lonnie R. Townsend, LaMorris Marshall, Douglas Foust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Major Michael A. Collum, Melissa J. Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
United States and Scott Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Lubbock County Detention Center
as 5:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Alishia Morris
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Limas v. Morris et al
as 7:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jose Roberto Limas
Defendant:
Holly Morris and Luke Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinson v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Minter and FNU Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Sheriff Department et al
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Cardenas
Defendant:
Sheriff Department, Police Department, Judge David Cobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
