Cases 21 - 30 of 441
Fernando Hinestroza v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-10560
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Turner v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Zachary Keith Turner
Respondent:
Mark S. Inch, Department of Corrections and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Toliver v. The Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
David G. Toliver
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Corrections, Centurion of Florida, LLC, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. INCH et al
as 4:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
ZACHARY KEITH TURNER
Respondent:
MARK S INCH, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SANDERS v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
BARRY SANDERS
Defendant:
MARK S INCH and ICT BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERGUSON v. INCH et al
as 5:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN DAVID FERGUSON
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, LESTER FERNANDEZ, SUMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Fiorucci et al
as 2:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Fiorucci, Secretary Mark S. Inch and DeSoto Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORRALES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2021cv03422
Plaintiff:
CARLOS R CORRALES
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SANTA ROSA COUNTY FLORIDA, MARK S INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferro v. Inch.
as 1:2021cv24097
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ferro and Nicholas Christopher Ferro
Respondent:
Secretary Mark S. Inch.
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1260
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
