Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Mathis v. Rahmire et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00436
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
W. Rahmire, L. Devauyr, Joseph Womble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Burns et al
as 4:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Arlo Townsend
Defendant:
Brandon L Burns, Carter, Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
Cedric De'Von Lowe
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Terressa T Pulliam, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Marcus D McQueen
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Birmingham Police Department, B C Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Sasser et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robert McCormick
Defendant:
Sgt. Sasser, Sgt. Crossley, Lt. Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Flowers, J Benett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Withers v. Hearns et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert Withers
Defendant:
Kyle Hearns, Officer Moore, Officer Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Louis Boyd , Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
