Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Lowe v. Mills
as 4:2020cv00213
Respondent:
Andrew Mills
Petitioner:
John B Lowe and John B. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murshid v. Keys et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Cooper, Unknown Keys, Unknown Woodall and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulkhaliq M. Murshid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00277
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Ellis
Defendant:
Mike Hatten, Pelicia Hall, Unknown Thomas and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. Mills
as 1:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
Charles Tolliver
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasheed v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Anthony G. Beasley, Joshua Csaszar, Andrew C. Mills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Akeem Abdullah Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mario Terrell Rucker
Defendant:
Anthony Beasley, Pelicia Hall, Joshua Csaszar and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mills
as 1:2019cv00530
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adrian Orville Moore
Defendant:
Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00357
Defendant:
Joe Arrington, Pelicia Hall, Regina Reed and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Joe Arrington, Andrew Mills and Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00356
Defendant:
Joe Arrington, Andrew Mills and Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
