Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Mills v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2017cv02287
Petitioner:
James Ronald Mills, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOR v. WANGLEY et al
as 2:2017cv05532
Petitioner:
TEPONG LOR
Respondent:
GEORGE WANGLEY, DAVID N. CZAPO, NICHOLAS E. ORLYK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLS v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2017cv04628
Petitioner:
SELWYN MILLS
Respondent:
THERESA A. DELBALSO, THE ATTORNEY GENRAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Kipple et al
as 3:2017cv01526
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Riley
Defendant:
Kipple, Amjad Ali, Aaron Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv01331
Petitioner:
George Blaine Mills
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole , John J Talaber and State Attorney General of Penn.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mills v. United States
as 3:2017cv01290
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tyrone Mills
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
DEWALD et al v. HILLER et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. DEWALD, II, KRIS PYLANT, DAMIEN CAMMILE and others
Defendant:
MARK HILLER, DAVID BYRNE and COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsmith v. Franklin County et al
as 3:2016cv00952
Plaintiff:
Norman Goldsmith
Defendant:
Franklin County, Samples, Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Merrell et al
as 1:2014cv02322
Plaintiff:
Allen Kelly
Defendant:
J. T. Merrell, R. Reed, Rauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
