Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Hatten v. Holland et al
as 1:2009cv02853
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
J. C. Holland, R. Andert, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deberry v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv02789
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Deberry
Respondent:
Blake R. Davis, Michael Nalley and Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gillon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2009cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ingmar Gillon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Blake Davis, US Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barringer v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv02269
Plaintiff:
Derek W. Barringer
Defendant:
Marty C. Anderson, Michael K. Nalley, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McMillan v. Wiley et al
as 1:2009cv01709
Plaintiff:
Shane McMillan
Defendant:
Wiley, Fox, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adams v. Wiley et al
as 1:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Eric Adams
Defendant:
R. Wiley, D. Roy, T. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nichols v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Nichols
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stanko v. Quay et al
as 1:2009cv00371
Petitioner:
Rudy Stanko
Respondent:
Herman Quay, Michael Nalley and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Twitty v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Gregory C. Langham and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv02678
Plaintiff:
Mark Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Michael K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
