Cases 21 - 30 of 35
(PC) Roberts v. Henderson
as 2:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Stephen Henderson
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Roberts v. Robert Presley Detention Center-Riverside County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Defendant:
Robert Presley Detention Center-Riverside County Jail and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Roberts v. CDCR Trust Office
as 1:2019cv00310
Defendant:
CDCR Trust Office
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Nathaniel Roberts v. CDCR Trust Office
as 2:2019cv01823
Defendant:
CDCR Trust Office
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Huckleberry, et al.
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
Medical Staffing, Sgt. Huckleberry, C/O Lascina and others
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Huckleberry et al
as 3:2018cv01928
Defendant:
Medical Staffing, Sgt Lascina, Sgt. Huckleberry and others
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05867
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL ROBERT RANDOLPH
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. Tritt et al
as 4:2015cv02041
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Robert Randolph
Respondent:
Brenda L. Tritt and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nathaniel Richardson v. Sheriff Gerald Couch, et al
as 14-10626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL ROBERT RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD COUCH, Sheriff, Hall County Sheriff's Office and KIRK PALMER, Sergeant, Hall County Work Release Program
GARVIN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv02017
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL ROBERT GARVIN, SR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
