Cases 21 - 30 of 36
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, PSYCOLOGY DEPARTMENT, OLIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEW v. EXTRACTION TEAM MEMBERS et al
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
EXTRACTION TEAM MEMBERS, JOHN DOE 2-10, VILARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MOORE et al
as 2:2015cv01622
Petitioner:
NEIL D. JACKSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND MOORE and TOM CORBET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv04850
Plaintiff:
PETER WALKER
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT., THOMAS F. SCARPATO, JR., JEFFREY STEIGEWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00171
Petitioner:
NEIL A. SIMPSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYEW v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv03329
Petitioner:
NEIL LYEW
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAWLERSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00848
Plaintiff:
NEIL T. RAWLERSON
Defendant:
NUTTER, FARELL, DEPUTY WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OPPENHEIM v. COMMONWEALTH
as 2:2012cv03435
Petitioner:
NEIL OPPENHEIM
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLOOM v. BARRETT et al
as 2:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
JASON M. BLOOM
Defendant:
STEPHEN BARRETT, MONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY COURT, NEIL STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEIL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
RACHEL NEIL
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN DOE, RAMON C. RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
