Cases 21 - 30 of 396
Fredricks v. Whittingham
as 1:2022cv04248
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Phillip Whittingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megginson v. Morales et al
as 1:2022cv03815
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
ESH ADW Morales, ESH ADW Green, ESH Kanol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwood v. 2 Security Guards at Food Bizar et al
as 1:2022cv03447
Plaintiff:
Phillip Blackwood
Defendant:
2 Security Guards at Food Bizar and Mount Vernon Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Surdak Read v. Town of Ramapo Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Michelle B. Surdak Read
Defendant:
Town of Ramapo Police Dept., P.O. Buckly, P.O. Furguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
Jinja Johnson and Kyng Pariah
Defendant:
Captain Johnson, Psych Dr. P., DOC, Rikers Island, RMSC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Pizarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Margaret Graham, Jessica Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud v. Romano et al
as 2:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Phillip McCloud
Defendant:
Romano, Morales, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisse v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Gregory King, Martin Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megginson v. Stukes et al
as 1:2021cv10690
Plaintiff:
Michael Megginson
Defendant:
Chief Stukes, Chief Glover, Det. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Hochul et al
as 7:2021cv10185
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jerome Gardner
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Hochul, Dr. Carl J. Koeigsman, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
