Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Majors v. Coffee County et al
as 1:2019cv00197
Defendant:
Lisa Swallows, Coffee County, Brandon Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01256
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Peter Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peters v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv02600
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mayo v. USA
as 3:2013cv00230
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Peter Mayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peters v. Stephens et al
as 3:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darnell Peters
Defendant:
Melinda Stephens and William Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nekic v. Burns et al
as 2:2012cv00358
Plaintiff:
Peter Nekic
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neil Mathews and Melanie Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. Hamilton County, Tennessee
as 1:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Edward Jerome Harbison
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. USA
as 1:2011cv00172
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marisha Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Delaney et al v. Johnson City Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Timothy Delaney and Tasha Boykin
Defendant:
Johnson City Police Department, - Lowery, Scottie Carrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madoff v. Barron's dba Barron's.com a/k/a www.Barrons.com, et al
as 4:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bernard Madoff doing business as Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Arthur Nadel and Arthur Nadel
Defendant:
Barron's doing business as Barron's.com also known as www.Barrons.com, Ward S McGuiness, Diane Sipprelle and others
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
