Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Jackson v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2015cv00724
Plaintiff:
Adrienne B. Jackson
Defendant:
St. Louis County Circuit Court, St. Louis County Justice Center, Stephen Ranz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Advanced Correctional Health Care
as 6:2015cv03196
Plaintiff:
Lowell S Porter
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Daviess- Dekalb Regional Jail District et al
as 5:2014cv06054
Plaintiff:
Steven Turner
Defendant:
Daviess- Dekalb Regional Jail District , Bob Gray , Carl Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Petitioner:
August B. Porter
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Hurst et al
as 4:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Herbert Johnson
Defendant:
Debra K. Hurst, Kathleen A. Witts, Carol A. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Cassady
as 4:2013cv02321
Petitioner:
Andre Porter
Respondent:
Jay Cassady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Koster et al
as 4:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Kerwin D. Scott
Defendant:
Chris Koster, Mary A. Twitty, Ronald Brockmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Sturm et al
as 2:2011cv04332
Plaintiff:
Andre Porter
Defendant:
Matt Sturm, Lisa Jones, Dave Dormire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Porter et al
as 4:2011cv01141
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Harris
Defendant:
Marjore Porter, Nicole Mudd, David Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2011cv03169
Plaintiff:
Eugene Darwin Porter
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
