Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Yentzer v. Potter County et al
as 3:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Potter County, Deputy Warden Angela Milford, Warden Glenn C. Drake, II and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Yentzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frescas v. Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas
as 2:2020cv00188
Respondent:
Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas
Petitioner:
Roberto Frescas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Contreras v. Potter County Sheriff
as 2:2020cv00099
Respondent:
Potter County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Michael Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzales v. Potter County Jail
as 2:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gonzales
Defendant:
Potter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Brent Huckabay Law Firm, PLLC, Steven J Deal, Cameron Kent Camarillo and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrade v. Amarillo Police Department and Police Officers et al
as 2:2019cv00152
Defendant:
Potter County Sheriff Department an Staff, Nancy Esparza, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Valdez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Dunn v. Texas Governor, et al
as 18-50632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS GOVERNOR, TEXAS TRIAL JUDGES, TEXAS COUNTY COURTS and others
Dunn v. Texas Governor et al
as 6:2018cv00182
Defendant:
GRANBURY TX., HOOD COUNTY, EL PASO TX., EL PASO COUNTY, HOUSTON, TX. HARRIS COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pernell Robinson, Jr. v. Young, et al
as 17-10087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERNELL ROBINSON, JR., also known as Pernell Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN YOUNG, Officer, MAIL ROOM and POTTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Robinson v. Lemmon et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Pernell Robinson
Defendant:
NFN Lemmon, Potter County Detention Center and NFN Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
