Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Quliez v. Force, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01716
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Quliez
Defendant:
J. Force, Jr., B. Scaley, C. Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pray v. Ogunsamus et al
as 3:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Vashon Pray
Defendant:
Olugbenga Adeleke Ogunsamus, Corizon Health and Wexford Health Source
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curt Lockett v. John Doe, et al
as 15-12580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURT MARQUAIN LOCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, TWO FOUR EIGHT, CHO N. SANCHEZ, Gulf CI Chief Health Officer, PRAY, Officer Formerly John Doe One, a.k.a. Prey and others
Cheatham v. Leavenworth County of et al
as 5:2015cv03123
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cheatham
Defendant:
Leavenworth County of, (fnu) King and (fnu) Pray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Pray v. Craig Farwell, et al
as 14-15698
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RONALD PRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FARWELL and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pray v. Zickefouse
as 3:2012cv02604
Petitioner:
Mark Pray
Respondent:
D. Zickefouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pray v. Billingsley
as 12-3978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wayne Pray
Defendant - Appellee:
Billingsley, Warden
Pray v. Billingsley
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Wayne Pray
Defendant:
Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davidson v. Green
as 11-4316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Davidson
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Stinson, Superintendent at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sergeant Pray, Corrections Sergeant at Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Mr.Green, Deputy of Security at Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Davidson v. Green et al
as 11-4078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Davidson
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Stinson, Superintendent at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Sergeant Pray, Corrections Sergeant at Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Mr.Green, Deputy of Security at Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
