Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Edmond v. Byars et al
as 1:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jesse Edmond
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr , Joseph M McFadden , Nurse Dehart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Berkeley County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jordan McDaniel
Defendant:
Berkeley County Jail and Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman v. South Carolina Department of Correctiona et al
as 4:2013cv03523
Plaintiff:
La'Quan Ramell Hyman
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Lee Correction Institutional Medical Health Care Provider , Judy Rabon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, State of South Carolina Taxpayers, People of Charleston Taxpayers and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
SCDMH Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Schulze et al
as 8:2011cv00703
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Robert Schulze, Martin Dommers, MD Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Lockemy et al
as 8:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Ms Lockemy, Michelle Fox, Rolland McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Lockemy et al
as 8:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Ms Lockemy, Michelle Fox, Rolland McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Stokes et al
as 8:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Shelly Stokes, Roland McFadden, Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Stokes et al
as 2:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darren S Simmons
Defendant:
Shelly Stokes, Roland McFadden, Robin Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. Providence Hospitle et al
as 3:2010cv01899
Plaintiff:
Servando Lopez Munoz
Defendant:
Providence Hospitle and Columbia Regional Care Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
