Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
Kim Jones, Wanda Jones, Joe White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Domanick v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Martindale Domanick
Defendant:
Attorney General, Regional Director, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medearis v. Bradley et al
as 3:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Roni L. Medearis
Defendant:
Barbara Bradley, James Danheim and Steve Massie, Asst. Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Massie, Asst. Regional Director et al
as 3:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Vaughn
Defendant:
Steve Massie, Asst. Regional Director, J. Jones, Asst. Warden, Sgt. Augustine Osadolor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baynard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2015mc00464
Plaintiff:
Cling Mark Baynard
Defendant:
Mr. Stephens, Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cherry v. Officer Dollar et al
as 9:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
William Cherry
Defendant:
Officer Dollar, Sgt. Rains, Officer Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Defendant:
United States of America, Regional Director Keller, Warden Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Abbott et al
as 1:2015cv00092
Respondent:
Gov. Greg Abbott, Grivances Ladies, O.I.G. and others
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
