Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Hooker v. Davis
as 4:2019cv00283
Respondent:
Warden Rocky Moore and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00959
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Sr. Warden Rocky Moore
Petitioner:
Saul Isaac Flores
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirvin v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv00695
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Rocky Moore
Petitioner:
James Anthony Kirvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kirvin v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv03247
Respondent:
Rocky Moore, Lori D Davis and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
James Anthony Kirvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blakely v. Morgan et al
as 4:2018cv02798
Respondent:
Rocky Moore, UTMB and Joe Morgan
Petitioner:
Optimus Blakely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenor v. Moore et al
as 4:2017cv03286
Plaintiff:
Donald R Lenor
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, Chima Ibeakamma, Dovie C Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy Green v. Rocky Moore, et al
as 17-11238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVY LEE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKY MOORE, Warden, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Middleton Unit, CHRISTOPHER ESCOBAR, Lieutenant, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Middleton Unit, SAMMY DOOLITTLE, JR., Lieutenant, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Middleton Unit and others
Dillon v. Moore et al
as 4:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kyle Dillon
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, Kyle Prentice, Carolyn Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kincade v. Moore
as 3:2016cv00357
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ronald S. Kincade
Respondent:
Warden Rocky Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Moore et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ivy Lee Green
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, Christopher Escobar, Sammy Doolittle, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
