Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Rushing v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Mark Rushing
Defendant:
Elkhart County, State of Indiana, B Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. ELKHART COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv00704
Defendant:
ELKHART COUNTY and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
MARK RUSHING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Looney v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Archie Lee Looney
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Traci Riggle, Corrections Officer Van-Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoglund v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Edgar D Whitcomb, Mitch Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushing v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Rushing
Defendant:
United States, Ambulatory Care Solutions LLC, Andrea Scremin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Tippecanoe County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jason Tye Myers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Circuit Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, James S Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSH v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEIN v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2016cv00203
Defendant:
J. CRONAU, BRUCE LEMMON, DAVID LIEBEL and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN STEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSHING v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2016cv00189
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RUSHING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RUSH v. BURROWS et al
as 2:2016cv00169
Defendant:
LENA BURROWS, BRUCE LEMMON, BRIAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOE RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
