Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Washington v. Elyea et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01076
Plaintiff: Sullivan Washington
Defendant: Willard Elyea, Cynthia Holbrook, Kevin Gilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Randolph
as 1:2008cv03551
Petitioner: Patrick Turner
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Willis v. Randolph et al
as 1:2008cv02144
Petitioner: Anthony Willis
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr. and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gill v. Randolph
as 2:2007cv02199
Petitioner: Martines Gill
Respondent: Austin S Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell vs Osafo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01288
Plaintiff: Ricky Bell
Defendant: Seth Osafo, Austin S Randolph, Jackie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff: Leo Lionel Payne
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia and S. Randolph Sengel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturgeon v. Randolph
as 3:2007cv03127
Petitioner: Ronald W Sturgeon
Respondent: Austin S Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv02354
Plaintiff: Curtis Coleman
Defendant: Roger E Walker, Sr, Austin S. Randolph, Jr., Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeSure v. Randolph et al
as 1:2007cv02220
Petitioner: Chris LeSure-El
Respondent: Austin S Randolph and Attorney General of the State eof Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Randolph et al
as 1:2007cv01404
Petitioner: Efren Alonso
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr. and Lisa M. Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?