Cases 21 - 30 of 848
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A., Pharmacy Nurse R. Carter and 6.6955
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yo v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Yo
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Mr. B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Smith
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Donna Shiflett and Jason Miyares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gordon Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Cynthia J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A., 0.0469 Captain Hayes and 0.0560 Lt. Hailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Najacque v. City of Hampton Commonwealth VA et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Najacque
Defendant:
City of Hampton Commonwealth VA and Detective Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
