Cases 21 - 30 of 80
COUTINHO-SILVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02898
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON JOSE COUTINHO-SILVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. Moclock et al
as 3:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Trisha Kelley, Superintendent McGinley, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Enrico Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coutinho-Silva v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00783
Plaintiff:
Anderson Coutinho-Silva
Defendant:
Ramirez, Food Service Staff, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shade v. Stanish et al
as 3:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Kimberlee Drum, Bernadette Mason, Donald J. O'Brien and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Adam Shade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELTER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS WELTER
Defendant:
MARCY DUDDY, SCI FAYETTE, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LOPEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00367
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE, JANE AND JOHN DOE and JOSEPH J. SILVA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SELDON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Defendant:
DR. SUTHERLAND, JOHN DOE LEE, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
