Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Simmons #087136 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv01415
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Wayne Calvin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ybarra v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
Robert Ybarra
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cherry Phillips, Yolanda Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simmons v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00329
Petitioner:
Curtis Graylin Simmons
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons #129437 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2012cv00435
Petitioner:
Ricky Lamar Simmons
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons #063313 v. Brewer
as 2:2012cv01148
Petitioner:
Lamar Simmons
Respondent:
Janice K Brewer and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00574
Petitioner:
Wayne Calvin Simmons
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Sponsel
as 2:2010cv02307
Petitioner:
Curtis Graylin Simmons
Respondent:
April Sponsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S. et al
as 2:2010cv01601
Plaintiff:
T Terell Bryan
Defendant:
Defense Technology U.S., United States Attorney's Office, Miriam Cocciolone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Loretta Greer
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Harris, Frazior and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dolezal v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Scott Riley Dolezal
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Larkin, Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
