Cases 21 - 30 of 264
Spragans v. USA et al
as 7:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawan I. Spragans
Defendant:
USA, Mr. L. T. Moore, Ms. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dixon v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Dijon T. Dixon
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Scarborough
as 3:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Erik T. Anderson
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Julius T. Moore
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Proctor v. Gilley et al
as 6:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Proctor
Defendant:
T. Gilley, H. Ray, T. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
H. Joyner, D. Altizer, Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proctor v. Gilley et al
as 5:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Proctor
Defendant:
T. Gilley, H. Ray, T. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Daley et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
James Kline Myers
Defendant:
Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shakur v. Paul et al
as 5:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
Mutulu Shakur and Jeral Williams
Respondent:
David Paul, Patricia K. Cushwa and Charles T. Massarone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bozeman v. Walker Mechanical Maintanace et al
as 3:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
Walker Mechanical Maintanace and T. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
