Cases 21 - 30 of 377
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv06494
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv06016
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NIGRO v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv05694
Petitioner:
PHILLIP NIGRO
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and KARON TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv05301
Plaintiff:
LOGAN CLIFF WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN TAYLOR, CAPTAIN STALLINGS, CAPTAIN LEEHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. TRINIDAD et al
as 1:2022cv04936
Plaintiff:
MELVIN R. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
KEVIN TRINIDAD, JOSEPH DIULIO, ARLINGTON RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWELL v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv04796
Plaintiff:
MARK C HOWELL, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR and CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
CAROLE MAE MARSHALL
Defendant:
WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDT v. OFFICER MORGAN et al
as 2:2022cv03379
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
OFFICER MORGAN, NURSE ALEXIS, ALFARO ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMASSINI v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TOMASSINI
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
