Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Taylor v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, Leslie Mahlman, Lauder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Sheldon
as 4:2022cv01271
Petitioner:
Austin Taylor Burke
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Henderson v. DeWine et al
as 2:2022cv02606
Interested Party:
State Of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike DeWine, Amy Acton, Annette Chamber-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Duncan et al
as 3:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Tyler W.A. Duncan, Dale R. Osborn, Brandon Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wormald v. Bracy et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wormald
Defendant:
Warden Charmaine Bracy, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Brandon Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Debose v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Terrance Debose
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Council, Armond D Budish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Alfonso C. Askew v. Trumbull County et al
as 4:2021cv02133
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alfonso C. Askew
Defendant:
Trumbull County, Dr. Phillip Malvasi D.O. LLC, D.O. Phillip Malvasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Turner
as 1:2021cv02088
Petitioner:
Clifford Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv05103
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
